Hr.
was
found guilty of
desertion
disantred the service on
the 61
6th May.
the count Martial also found him guilty
on the 5 changes f
K.
Bethany Conduct to
the prejudice of Good Ordu & Military Discipline
Cheques (though not on the
in passing the
more serious alterative charpes of "B chaving
scandalous
Character of
حدة
GURMEENA
unbefilling the offien & a Gentlemen", which inothead,
his knowing will that he had not enough money at Cords to last the cheques). But as the
evidence adduced did not justify the findings
7 port
then
charge.
1.16 King
pleased to withhold confirmation of them'
thes the only finding against & Barlow
is
the charge of desertion.
It and be wohet (ake of procedings) that
he produced medical evidence from 17ht
7 W Ritson RAME that his condition is such
V
that he might to anything wiresponseth? this defence wo
the a
water
hime out
Sort sewant.
bur Barlow has now recalistest
* A
unsuitable 5
tre 136 of proceedings
? Well
say that
The
and be
A.C
20
Along
the
farts
somewhat
Ca-ae
130
in secret dish..
450
(35241/7 7 dad)
have expressed the view that laut
sbyon from the fount of weed of
uiting discipline to
A
desemissed offre being
allowed subject to the affroval of lan for, a resmene
Cst. offt: say
the duties of
his
that ca. have
been instructed art & issue any for aller from
#hong fonds pending for. with: & not what
action he considers
Padl be latter
RB
25/778
Conviction
Č
I cannot find the refer to the sisuges
respect to the chiques hot being Confirmed - but by Isl. Certainly aguetter there was no Evidence
justifying a Conviction thereon.
The to Called desection does not strike,
sue as being a very
being a very hervous. If it was
A real attempt to desect in the ordinary-
acctiation of the teen he would hardly. have visited C. Aerlox. And I am fortified to my belief that be heree really.
me autis
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.